Heroines Who Help Their Bosses Shine ; Jo Ind Reports On the Challenge of Singing the Praises of the Unsung Heroines of Industry by Looking Back at the Long Search to Find the Midlands' Pa of the Year
Birmingham Post › December 29, 2005
Linked as:
Birmingham Post › December 29, 2005
Linked as:Summary
There is an inherent contradiction with getting PAs to enter a competition. In their daily work, PAs are there to support. They are there to make their bosses look good.
Add to that the fact, in almost all cases, PAs are women who as a sex are more modest than men, and you end up with contestants who have to be practically dragged to the stage to be celebrated as the stars that they are.See the full content of this document
Extract
Heroines Who Help Their Bosses Shine ; Jo Ind Reports On the Challenge of Singing the Praises of the Unsung Heroines of Industry by Looking Back at the Long Search to Find the Midlands' Pa of the Year
The Midlands' PA of the Year award, sponsored by Tirebuck Career Solutions and The Birmingham Post, held its awards ceremony at Birmingham's Hotel du Vin.
Karen Tirebuck, managing director of Tirebuck Career Solutions, said: "The competition is to highlight the incredible role that PAs contribute to business. Business would crumble without them."The standard of entries for PA of the Year was v...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United Kingdom
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Cricket | Steering Group | Take It As Red, We're After Pool | in praise of the scottish accent | Kathryn Mcinnis-Misenor Brett Misenor Plaintiffs Appellants v Maine Medical Center Defendant Appellee. 319 F.3d 63 1st Cir 2003 | John Richard Brage Appellant v Melvin R Laird Draper L Kaufman and D H Guinn Appellees. 461 F.2d 660 8th Cir 1972 | Mabel Nevin, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee., 696 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1983) | Hughes v Cardinal Wireline * 889 F.2d 273 5th Cir 1989